Finding Good First Issues
Not all "good first issues" are actually good. Learn to find the real opportunities.
Where to Find Issues
1. GitHub Labels
Most projects use labels to mark beginner-friendly issues:
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
good first issue | Official GitHub label for beginners |
help wanted | Maintainers actively seeking help |
beginner-friendly | Custom label, same meaning |
easy | Low complexity |
documentation | Doc-related (often good for starters) |
hacktoberfest | Valid for Hacktoberfest |
2. Search Queries
# On GitHub, use these searches:
# All good first issues in a language
label:"good first issue" language:javascript
# Good first issues with no assignee
label:"good first issue" no:assignee
# Recent good first issues (last 7 days)
label:"good first issue" created:>2024-01-01
# In specific organization
org:facebook label:"good first issue"3. Dedicated Platforms
| Platform | URL | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Good First Issues | goodfirstissues.com | Curated beginner issues |
| Up For Grabs | up-for-grabs.net | Variety of projects |
| First Timers Only | firsttimersonly.com | First contribution ever |
| CodeTriage | codetriage.com | Helping with triage |
| Awesome for Beginners | github.com/MunGell/awesome-for-beginners | Curated list |
4. Program-Specific Sources
Evaluating Issue Quality
✅ Green Flags (Good Signs)
Look for:
| Signal | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Clear description | Maintainer thought about it |
| Recent comments | Issue is still relevant |
| Maintainer responded | Someone cares about this |
| Labels are appropriate | Project is organized |
| Acceptance criteria | You know when you're done |
| Referenced in roadmap | Important to the project |
❌ Red Flags (Warning Signs)
Avoid:
| Signal | What It Means |
|---|---|
| No activity for 6+ months | Likely abandoned |
| "Stale" or "wontfix" labels | Not a priority |
| Many attempted PRs, all closed | Unclear requirements |
| Heated discussions | Politics involved |
| Vague like "improve performance" | No clear direction |
| Assigned but inactive | Someone else has it |
Issue Quality Assessment
Quick Score Method
Rate each factor 1-5:
Issue Score =
Clarity (1-5) +
Recency (1-5) +
Maintainer Engagement (1-5) +
Scope Appropriateness (1-5) +
Learning Value (1-5)
Score > 20: Excellent issue
Score 15-20: Good issue
Score 10-15: Proceed with caution
Score < 10: Look elsewhereExample Evaluation
Issue: "Fix broken pagination on user list"
| Factor | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Clarity | 4 | Clear what's broken |
| Recency | 5 | Opened 2 days ago |
| Maintainer | 5 | Maintainer commented "happy to help" |
| Scope | 4 | Well-defined, single component |
| Learning | 4 | Learn about pagination, API calls |
| Total | 22 | Excellent issue! |
Fake "Good First Issues"
Spotting Fake Ones
Some issues are labeled "good first issue" but aren't:
Common Fake Patterns
1. The Disguised Monster
Title: "Simple UI fix"
Reality: Requires understanding entire state management system2. The Outdated Label
Title: "Add basic feature" (labeled 2 years ago)
Reality: Codebase has completely changed3. The Scope Creep
Title: "Fix small bug"
Comments: "Also need to refactor X, update Y, test Z..."
Reality: Not small anymore4. The Impossible Standard
Title: "Improve performance"
Reality: No metrics, no baseline, how do you know when done?The Search Strategy
Step 1: Choose Your Criteria
# Your filters
Language: JavaScript
Difficulty: Beginner
Time: 4-8 hours
Type: Bug fix or documentation
Project: Active (commits in last month)Step 2: GitHub Search
label:"good first issue" language:javascript created:>2024-01-01 comments:>2Step 3: Filter Results
For each result, check:
- Last commit to repo < 30 days
- Issue has maintainer comment
- Issue is unassigned
- Issue has clear requirements
- Project has CONTRIBUTING.md
Step 4: Deep Dive on Top 3
For your top candidates:
- Read entire issue thread
- Check related code files
- Look at similar merged PRs
- Evaluate if you can solve it
Issue Hunting Workflow
Projects Known for Good First Issues
Frontend
- React - Large but well-documented
- Vue.js - Welcoming community
- Angular - Structured contribution process
- Next.js - Active maintainers
Backend
- Node.js - Many entry points
- Django - Great documentation
- Express.js - Simple codebase
- FastAPI - Modern, clean code
Tools & Infrastructure
- VS Code - Massive but organized
- Kubernetes - Well-labeled issues
- Docker - Clear contribution guides
Time Invested Wisely
| Activity | Good Time Investment | Bad Time Investment |
|---|---|---|
| Finding issue | 1-2 hours | 5+ hours |
| Reading issue | 30 min | 5 min (too quick) |
| Checking codebase | 1 hour | Skip entirely |
| Asking questions | As needed | Never (stuck for days) |
Pro Tips
1. Follow Before Contributing
Week 1: Star repo, watch issues
Week 2: Read issues, understand patterns
Week 3: Pick an issue and contribute2. Start with What You Know
If you know React → Find React issues If you know Python → Find Python issues If you know testing → Add tests
3. Look at Closed PRs First
# See what gets merged
# Check merged PRs from new contributors
# Understand the review process4. Check the "Pulse"
On GitHub, check Insights → Pulse:
- Recent commits
- Open/closed issues ratio
- PR merge rate
Next Steps
Found some potential issues? Learn how to pick the best one:
➡️ Picking Issues That Get Merged →
Pro Tip: The best issues aren't always labeled. Sometimes a recent bug report with maintainer interest is better than a stale "good first issue."